It is getting absolutely insane the lengths to which teachers, administrators, and curriculum designers go these days to sneak sexually explicit and morally questionable material into school materials.
The commentator Matt Walsh rightfully called this “grooming” on his show before the Sex Ed Walkout, which he fully endorsed and which was a huge success, exposing the blatant brainwashing taking place in our nation’s schools.
We report on numerous incidents of this “grooming” every month on this website, and sadly, the examples just keep coming. Gender identity, homosexuality, and detailed tutorials on explicit sex acts are becoming the norm, and they’re not even limited to sex ed anymore.
A California school district recently ruled that parents could not excuse their children from any kind of lesson other than sex ed, very convenient considering they are legally allowed to teach on all things related to sexuality and gender if it does not directly refer to sex organs and their functions.
A Florida father was recently outraged to discover that his daughter’s school seems to be falling in line with this trend, sneaking a completely unnecessary explicit and inappropriate question into what should have been a simple question on blood types.
The question, which Omar Austin discovered on his daughter’s anatomy assignment from Westside High School in Duval County, Florida, read:
“Ursula was angry after her boyfriend broke up with her after having sex. To get revenge, she had sex with his best friend the next day. Ursula had a beautiful baby girl nine months later. Ursula has type O blood, her ex-boyfriend has type AB blood and his best friend is type A blood. If her baby daddy is her ex-boyfriend what could the possible blood type(s) of her baby NOT be.”
“What the heck?” he said in a Facebook post on the outrageous question. “This is a disgrace to our educational system and probably one of the most biased pieces of information I have ever read. Where the hell are our schools going?”
No comments:
Post a Comment